Tom asks about a situation where mailboxes on an Exchange Server 2010 database that is no longer part of a database availability group are showing different values for the ServerName attribute.
I’ve had this question a few times before so I wanted to demonstrate the behaviour of Exchange when it comes to that ServerName attribute.
To begin with, I have a database MB-HO-01 in my DAG that is active on server HO-EX2010-MB1. If I retrieve a count of mailboxes grouped by ServerName, then this is the result.
[PS] C:>Get-Mailbox -Database MB-HO-01 | Group-Object -Property:ServerName | Select Name,Count | ft -auto Name Count ---- ----- ho-ex2010-mb1 140
So, of the 140 mailboxes on the database they all have a ServerName value of “ho-ex2010-mb1”.
Next, I move the active database copy to server HO-EX2010-MB2.
[PS] C:>Move-ActiveMailboxDatabase MB-HO-01 -ActivateOnServer HO-EX2010-MB2 Confirm Are you sure you want to perform this action? Moving mailbox database "MB-HO-01" from server "HO-EX2010-MB1.exchangeserverpro.net" to server "HO-EX2010-MB2.exchangeserverpro.net". [Y] Yes [A] Yes to All [N] No [L] No to All [?] Help (default is "Y"): y Identity ActiveServerAtS ActiveServerAtE Status NumberOfLogsLost RecoveryPoint MountStatus MountStatus tart nd Objective AtMoveStart AtMoveEnd -------- --------------- --------------- ------ ---------------- ------------- ----------- ----------- MB-HO-01 ho-ex2010-mb1 ho-ex2010-mb2 Succeeded 0 5/18/2014 ... Mounted Mounted
Then, I create a new mailbox on the database MB-HO-01.
[PS] C:>New-Mailbox "Test1" -Shared -Database MB-HO-01 Name Alias ServerName ProhibitSendQuota ---- ----- ---------- ----------------- Test1 Test1 ho-ex2010-mb2 unlimited
As you can see the ServerName attribute matches the name of the server where the database is currently active.
Another look at mailboxes on MB-HO-01 grouped by server name now shows a different result:
[PS] C:>Get-Mailbox -Database MB-HO-01 | Group-Object -Property:ServerName | Select Name,Count | ft -auto Name Count ---- ----- ho-ex2010-mb1 140 ho-ex2010-mb2 1
I then move the active database copy back to HO-EX2010-MB1.
[PS] C:>Move-ActiveMailboxDatabase MB-HO-01 -ActivateOnServer HO-EX2010-MB1 Confirm Are you sure you want to perform this action? Moving mailbox database "MB-HO-01" from server "HO-EX2010-MB2.exchangeserverpro.net" to server "HO-EX2010-MB1.exchangeserverpro.net". [Y] Yes [A] Yes to All [N] No [L] No to All [?] Help (default is "Y"): y Identity ActiveServerAtS ActiveServerAtE Status NumberOfLogsLost RecoveryPoint MountStatus MountStatus tart nd Objective AtMoveStart AtMoveEnd -------- --------------- --------------- ------ ---------------- ------------- ----------- ----------- MB-HO-01 ho-ex2010-mb2 ho-ex2010-mb1 Succeeded 0 5/18/2014 ... Mounted Mounted
The server name attribute of the new mailbox retains its value of HO-EX2010-MB2.
[PS] C:>Get-Mailbox -Database MB-HO-01 | Group-Object -Property:ServerName | Select Name,Count | ft -auto Name Count ---- ----- ho-ex2010-mb1 140 ho-ex2010-mb2 1
As you can see, when a mailbox is created on a database that is part of a DAG the ServerName attribute is assigned a value of the name of the server hosting the active database copy at a time. It would be normal to see a mix of different server names for mailboxes on the same database if the active copy was not strictly maintained on the same DAG member the majority of the time.
Tom’s case takes this a little further – he has removed the DAG and has two standalone mailbox servers now. Even though only one copy of the database exists, some of those mailboxes still show a ServerName value for the *other* server that does not host that database at all. I believe the issue here is simply that the ServerName attribute is not updated even if you remove your DAG and revert to standalone mailbox servers.
This is not a fault or bug, it is just the behaviour of the product.
this was what I meant:)
http://blogs.technet.com/b/appssrv/archive/2014/03/10/get-mailbox-does-not-reflect-the-correct-servername-for-mailboxes-on-databases-for-a-dag.aspx
The Real Person!
Author Paul Cunningham acts as a real person and passed all tests against spambots. Anti-Spam by CleanTalk.
There you go. I haven’t paid attention to that attribute in a long time.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/timmcmic/archive/2011/09/26/exchange-2010-homemta-and-msexchhomeservername-are-not-updated-on-mailboxes.aspx
Hi Paul
I remember a lot of people used to 2007 and lower asked me the same questions many times
it turns out(documented) that server name is not being used to track mailboxes anymore.
it gets stamped only when you first move(migration) from older versions.
or create a new mailbox.
it wont update in any other scenario.
ill try to find the article and paste a reply(I have seen Microsoft blog reporting this again few weeks ago)