Comments on: Responses to Chemical Wedding film review http://plutonica.net/2008/06/08/responses-to-chemical-wedding-film-review/ An esoteric blog exploring the occult and occulture, philosophy, spirituality, and magick. Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:30:59 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: ankh_f_n_khonsu http://plutonica.net/2008/06/08/responses-to-chemical-wedding-film-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1352 ankh_f_n_khonsu Tue, 10 Jun 2008 00:04:38 +0000 http://plutonica.net/?p=209#comment-1352 Crowley may have been a twit, but it seems a bit dismissive to reduce his massive contributions to magick and esoterica to his publishing of a few modified rituals and showmanship. I tend to agree - I generally hear comments like this from people with limited exposure to his systems and methods. They read enough to find parts that disgust them, then toss the whole batch into the garbage. <i>I think that's a mistake.</i> But at the same time, I readily recognize that he was a twit, and that's being <b>supremely</b> nice on my part. :)<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-1352">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p> Crowley may have been a twit, but it seems a bit dismissive to reduce his massive contributions to magick and esoterica to his publishing of a few modified rituals and showmanship.

I tend to agree – I generally hear comments like this from people with limited exposure to his systems and methods. They read enough to find parts that disgust them, then toss the whole batch into the garbage. I think that’s a mistake. But at the same time, I readily recognize that he was a twit, and that’s being supremely nice on my part. :)

Current score: 0 (to vote for this comment, please visit the site)

]]>