<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Field Guide to Otherkin, by Lupa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://plutonica.net/2008/03/09/review-a-field-guide-to-otherkin-by-lupa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://plutonica.net/2008/03/09/review-a-field-guide-to-otherkin-by-lupa/</link>
	<description>An esoteric blog exploring the occult and occulture, philosophy, spirituality, and magick.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:36:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lupa</title>
		<link>http://plutonica.net/2008/03/09/review-a-field-guide-to-otherkin-by-lupa/comment-page-1/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Lupa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plutonica.net/2008/03/09/review-a-field-guide-to-otherkin-by-lupa/#comment-208</guid>
		<description>Graci; I&#039;ve been anticipating your review! You&#039;ve gone into more detail than many, which I appreciate it. I was curious to see how you&#039;d review it, since you tend to have a particularly low tolerance for B.S., and there&#039;s always the potential with the topic of Otherkin for it to be interpreted as utter fluff. 

On the Mediakin/etc. topic, you&#039;re not the only one to question it--even Taylor called me out on some things when he was editing the text. While I have my questions regarding the concept, I wanted to try to be as impartial as possible, and since I was trying to do a pretty thorough overview of the community as a whole, I included the section on Mediakin.

Again, thank you for the thorough, detailed review!&lt;p class=&quot;top-comments&quot;&gt;Current score: &lt;span class=&quot;top-comments-karma&quot; id=&quot;karma-208&quot;&gt;0&lt;/span&gt; &lt;small&gt;(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graci; I&#8217;ve been anticipating your review! You&#8217;ve gone into more detail than many, which I appreciate it. I was curious to see how you&#8217;d review it, since you tend to have a particularly low tolerance for B.S., and there&#8217;s always the potential with the topic of Otherkin for it to be interpreted as utter fluff. </p>
<p>On the Mediakin/etc. topic, you&#8217;re not the only one to question it&#8211;even Taylor called me out on some things when he was editing the text. While I have my questions regarding the concept, I wanted to try to be as impartial as possible, and since I was trying to do a pretty thorough overview of the community as a whole, I included the section on Mediakin.</p>
<p>Again, thank you for the thorough, detailed review!
<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-208">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
