Humans Are Natural Creatures

There are those (Richard Dawkins¹ among them) who consider certain aspects of human behaviour to be contrary to nature, “unnatural”. Quite frankly, I don’t understand what this means. How could such a thing be possible? What is there that is beyond nature²?

With all this talk of what is “natural” and “unnatural” in recent posts we might do well to look at how these words are defined. The Canadian Oxford English Dictionary lists sixteen distinct definitions of the word “natural” with various sub-definitions employed as well. Foremost amongst these oft conflicting definitions³, and most relevant to our topic, “natural” is defined as “existing in or caused by nature; not artificial”. Whereas “unnatural”, which lists only four definitions, is first defined as “contrary to nature or the usual course of nature”.

If humans are to exist at all they must do so “in nature” for we encounter them regularly in the here and now (let’s leave the “mystical planes” out for now). The “artificial” bit might give pause as humans have a penchant for creating machines, which on the surface may seem “unnatural”, but by the same logic we ought to consider the spider’s web an “unnatural” creation along with the beaver’s dam. It’s not terribly meaningful to call these things unnatural, but if you’d like to make a case for it I’d love to hear it.

So what does it mean for a creature to act “against nature”? Presumably the creature would have to do something contrary to its normal behaviour, but “normal” is a floating average, apt to change, and requiring parameters to be meaningful. It might be normal for an American to eat a burger, but it might not be normal for an Indian⁴.

Conversely, is it normal for cows to attack humans? Excuses are made for their seemingly out of character behaviour, but as Chris Poole sensibly remarked: “It was unlucky the cows attacked… it is very rare but obviously it can happen.” At least these cows didn’t have guns, unlike this dog. Accidents, “freaks of nature”?

Nature is infinitely more complex than we give her credit for, and however improbable a thing seems, there is nothing that exists which is outside her realm.

Popularity: 8%

Footnotes:

1. [cref 15] [back]
2. Even magick has its place. A theme we’ll explore at later points in this blog. [back]
3. For example, “9 having a physical existence as opposed to what is spiritual” and “11 based on the innate moral sense” – more mystical indwelling “natures”. [back]
4. Or a Canadian vegetarian, for (a self-referential) example. [back]

Related posts:

1. Introduction, Then: Genes, Memes and Why Contraception is Natural
2. More on Doing It Naturally
3. On evolution
4. Love is the Law: Philios, True Will and the Great Work (Part I)
5. Creatures of Flight & Burrowing Both: On the magick & poetry of Datura